Anyone who knows me even tangentially knew what today's post was going to be about before you clicked on through.
Yesterday was the long awaited public unveiling of the next generation of jetpacks. Yes, the jetpack, which science fiction comics, TV shows and movies have promised us since at least the 1920s when Buck Rogers flew one.
In the 1960s, James Bond flew one in Thunderball and we were told they were right around the corner in real life.
In the 1990s, The Rocketeer had one and we were promised they were going to be available any minute.
Heck, just last month I saw Iron Man fly a jetpack built into his suit and as I drove away from the theater I noticed I was in a car, not a jetpack. Again. And I wept.
All that was supposed to change yesterday when the first long range personal human transporter was unveiled at an air show in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. The Martin Jetpack (details here) does make several noticeable improvements over anything that's flown before. It runs on regular gasoline, rises to about 8000 feet (although I am not clear why that is the top altitude), and, most importantly, allows one to fly for about 30 minutes.
On the down side, the technology is still nowhere near as compact as the backpack-sized device we've been expecting. Plus it's still about $100,000 - I know! - and seems like it might still have some stability problems on windy days like yesterday at the exhibition.
See the underwhelming video of that "flight" here but definitely check out MartinJetpack.com for updates periodically because this is a work in progress (and a lifetime labor of love for Mr. Glenn Martin) and they are headed in the right direction with it. Please let me live long enough to fly one one day. Even if it is literally the last thing I do.
Let me know when we have the version where you don't have to have a person on each side holding you up and I am in!
Posted by: Lynne_T | July 30, 2008 at 06:30 AM
"Jetpack" was spelled wrong. It's spelled S-U-C-K-E-R.
I'm pretty sure you won't have to wait long. I would give them a couple of years before they go bankrupt and then you can pick one up for $50.
Come to think of it, I could be wrong. The Moller Sky Car has been around for 20 years and has yet to fly. They keep pulling in money from somewhere.
http://www.moller.com/
It isn't a jet, it's a ducted fan driven by a really noisy two stroke engine.
For 1/10 the price you can buy an ultralight and have more fun.
The two guys on the side holding it up really shows how far their development program has come. Why show it at all?
To pull in more investors.
Posted by: Dean | July 30, 2008 at 07:19 AM
Do you really need to go 8000 feet in the air? what if the engine dies? A jetpack would be much more useful if you could glide to the bathroom, glide to the kitchen, glide to get the remote, and glide on back to the couch.
Posted by: alisa | July 30, 2008 at 07:45 AM
I think they 8000' limit is to prevent hypoxia...since this has such a small radar profile would this be considered a possible terrorist vehicle? it would be fun to just buzz the local moutains, farms or beaches with one of these...but honestly I think TMZ and the paps will be all over this cameras in hand snapping away like turtles.
Posted by: db | July 30, 2008 at 08:03 AM
In Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift the protagonist encountered a vessel which worked on the polarity of earth's gravity. It had a huge magnet which the pilot would play against the earth's polarity. Repeling polarities would cause the vessel to rise into the air, attracting polarities would cause the vessel to descend. It is amazing that we have never used this process to fly. I think the bullet trains in Japan use it to make the trains travel the speeds they do.
Posted by: Erick V. | July 30, 2008 at 08:39 AM
And where the hell is my flying car, while we're at it?
Posted by: Larry A. (Irvine, CA) | July 30, 2008 at 09:59 AM
Are you sure 8,000 feet was not a typo and they meant 8 feet. Does each jet pack come with directions on hiring two retired NBA players to hold each side just in case you actually have enough fuel to even reach the 8 feet?
Posted by: Wag | July 30, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Dang Bean, you beat me to it. I saw the article and clicked here to find your email address so I could forward it to you.
Hope you get to fly one someday.
Posted by: mary | July 30, 2008 at 10:15 AM
i saw the video on abc news yesterday and thought of you and how dissappointed you must be. that was a sad unveiling. the thing was so unstable
Posted by: Melika | July 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Didn't you fall off a moped once?
Posted by: Fred G. | July 30, 2008 at 02:20 PM
I'm Tired of my motorcycle jetpack seems like the natural progression. but 100,000 that seems like alot o well maybe hen i become a doctor.
Posted by: MenOfAllMen | July 30, 2008 at 04:35 PM
jetpack? this is not a jetpack! where are the jets? , if anything this is a turbinepack or a two-huge-fans-on-my-shoulders-pack.
jetpacks are still a dream ...
Posted by: Carlos | September 18, 2008 at 11:18 AM